Larger Groups of Students Use AI More Effectively in Learning
Researchers at the Institute of Education and the Faculty of Economic Sciences at HSE University have studied what factors determine the success of student group projects when they are completed with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). Their findings suggest that, in addition to the knowledge level of the team members, the size of the group also plays a significant role—the larger it is, the more efficient the process becomes. The study was published in Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
Group projects are an essential and common part of higher education, but there is still uncertainty about what makes teamwork effective.
The situation has become more interesting since the emergence of AI, which students have started to actively use in their studies. Experts from HSE University, including Galina Shulgina, Aleksandra Getman, Ilya Gulenkov, and Jamie Costley, explored how the characteristics of groups—the size and level of participants’ knowledge—affect the outcomes of work when AI is involved.
The study included 196 second-year undergraduate students, 55% of whom were male and 45% female. They had to solve problems as part of a team in a 16-week macroeconomics course. The students were divided into groups of five to eight people with varying levels of knowledge and experience. At first, the students worked independently on tasks. Then, they attended four seminars where they used ChatGPT 3.5 as a group tool. The goal was not simply to receive an answer from the AI, but to critically analyse it, apply economic models from the course, and present a comprehensive solution.
Researchers evaluated the quality of solutions based on the accuracy and detail of students' responses. Teams that not only used AI correctly but also revealed its limitations earned the highest scores, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the material.
The scientists identified several patterns in the use of AI by groups. Firstly, the best results were achieved by teams with members of similar levels of expertise. However, teams with a wider range of knowledge often performed less effectively. This is despite the fact that, in pedagogy, it is often believed that diversity of knowledge can help rather than hinder a team's performance.
Galina Shulgina
‘We were surprised to discover that the wider the range of student grades, the lower the quality of the final decision. This may be because the more prepared students spent time discussing and reaching an agreement on a solution, rather than focusing on the task itself, while less prepared students were unable to fully utilise the AI capabilities available to them. More skilled students are better at interacting with AI, as they can formulate more complex queries, critically evaluate the responses, and use this information to reason through problems,’ explains Galina Shulgina, junior researcher at the International Laboratory of Research and Design in eLearning at HSE University.
Secondly, the data showed a clear positive correlation between a larger team size and better performance when working with AI. Larger teams, with seven to eight members, performed better on average compared to teams with five to six members. Each additional member contributed to the final score, contrary to the common belief in pedagogy that smaller teams are more effective. Scientists argue that larger teams have more intellectual resources and a variety of perspectives, which help them interact more productively with neural networks.
Aleksandra Getman
‘However, this does not mean that efficiency gains will continue infinitely. After a certain point, negative effects may start to appear, such as difficulty in coordination and increased time to coordinate and maintain shared understanding of the task,’ explains Aleksandra Getman, junior researcher at the International Laboratory of Research and Design in eLearning at HSE University.
Despite the need for further research, the authors believe that in order to optimise the use of AI in education, students with similar educational levels should be grouped together in large classes. The researchers suggest that AI could be applied to the study of any subject.
Ilya Gulenkov
‘There is a potential for incorporating AI into group work in any course, regardless of the field of study or level of training. The key task of the teacher in organising such work is to set students’ expectations in advance about how and why AI can be used in their coursework. If students see examples of successful application of AI, then it can become an additional team member in any subject. We observe how students are using more advanced versions of the models (ChatGPT 5, ChatGPT 5 Thinking, etc), and we see great potential for student–AI collaboration. This applies not only to simple, standardised tasks, but also to complex ones that require in-depth understanding, working with multiple sources, and advanced reasoning. The role of students' own expertise in interacting with these models is becoming increasingly important. All models now provide plausible answers, but it is essential to critically evaluate their content,’ says Ilya Gulenkov, lecturer at HSE University’s Faculty of Economic Sciences.
See also:
‘The Peak of Stupidity’ and ‘The Valley of Despair’: HSE Economists Propose an Explanation for the Dunning–Kruger Effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect, which describes a sharp surge in self-confidence among beginners followed by an equally rapid decline as they gain experience, can be explained by the nature of the learning process and the acquisition of new knowledge. This conclusion was reached by Andrey Vorchik of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences together with independent researcher Murat Mamyshev. They developed a mathematical model of learning and demonstrated how subjective confidence is formed and changes as knowledge accumulates, as well as how teachers can reduce the ‘valley of despair’ experienced by learners.
Toffee and Risk: Scientists Discover Why People Who Crave Sweets Make More Impulsive Choices
Having a sweet tooth may be linked not only to eating habits but also to the way people make decisions. Researchers at HSE University have found that people with a preference for sweet foods tend to behave more impulsively—not because they want immediate rewards, but because they are less willing to tolerate uncertainty. These findings may help improve treatments for addiction. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Psychology.
Advancing Collaboration: HSE Faculty of Computer Science and Harbin Institute of Technology Hold Joint Seminar
From July 13 to 16, 2026, the Faculty of Computer Science hosted the Russian–Sino Research Seminar on Machine Learning Applications, organised by the HSE Laboratory for Cloud and Mobile Technologies in partnership with the Harbin Institute of Technology (China). A delegation comprising seven students and three university representatives travelled to Moscow to take part in an intensive four-day programme.
Physicists Find a Way to Model Ion Parameters in Plasma in Seconds
Researchers from HSE University and the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT) have developed a set of simple analytical methods for calculating the properties of heavy ions in helium under the influence of a strong electric field. The new approach speeds up calculations of ion mobility and ion–molecule reaction rates by thousands of times while maintaining sufficient accuracy for plasma jet modelling. The findings have been published in the journal Physica Scripta.
A New Section on AI and a Prizewinning Paper: Early-Career HSE Researchers Take Part in IEEE EDM Conference
The 27th IEEE International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM) has taken place in the Altai Republic. This year, researchers from HSE University presented the results of their research and were involved in organising a new section on artificial intelligence. A paper by HSE master’s student Rodion Sidorenko was awarded third place in the research paper competition at the conference.
‘AI Enables Researchers to Tackle More Complex and Important Problems’
In late July 2026, Dmitry Rybin, a graduate of the HSE Faculty of Mathematics who is now working in China, used ChatGPT to disprove a longstanding mathematical hypothesis. In an interview with the HSE News Service, he discussed AI's ability to make discoveries in mathematics, reflected on his time at HSE University, and spoke about his doctoral research at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Two Years of Growth or Decline: How to Choose an Investment Strategy
Economists from HSE University, together with colleagues from international universities, have analysed stock market movements over almost a century and proposed an investment strategy that could have delivered returns nearly twice as high as the market average. Their research suggests following a momentum strategy during periods of sustained market growth and switching to a value strategy after prolonged market declines. The study has been published in the Journal of Banking and Finance.
Researchers Reveal Link Between Attention and Communication Difficulties in Autism
Researchers at HSE University have examined how communication difficulties in children with autism are related to brain function. The findings show that not only language networks but also attention networks play an important role. The weaker the connections involved in maintaining focus and switching attention, the more pronounced communication difficulties were. The study has been published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
HSE Initiates Development of Ethical Standard for Anthropomorphic Robots
Beyond technological solutions, the development of anthropomorphic robotics also demands ethical ones. In July 2026, the HSE Institute for Robotics Systems hosted a foresight session dedicated to developing an Ethical Standard for Anthropomorphic Robotic Complexes. Representatives from businesses, government bodies, scientific organisations, and universities gathered to discuss key ethical and legal issues surrounding the development of anthropomorphic robotic complexes. The main outcome of the meeting was a draft of the Ethical Standard.
Scientists Discover Why Some People Wore Masks During COVID-19 While Others Did Not
Why do some people voluntarily follow new rules while others ignore them? Researchers at HSE University have found that the answer lies not so much in people's willingness to cooperate, as previously believed, but in their ability to empathise with others. Empathy proved to be the strongest predictor of whether people chose to wear face masks voluntarily during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings have been published in Frontiers.